Trump LOLZ!

Lol.... I want to see the look on peoples faces when he gets reelected in 2020. Seems like the dems are just digging the hole deeper. Please explain to me how he is blocking entry into the nation based on religion...lol. There are at least 50 Muslim Nations on Planet Earth and 43 can come and go as they please. Seven were stopped. Is that possibly because in the other 43 nation a national agency can pick up the phone and contact a national law enforcement agency to vet them?

My favorite moment was when the New person in charge of the Dem Party went on twitter to announce that the Dems were back and some of the replies were they were tired of the crap and saying goodbye to the Dem party...lol

New Engerlish Dickshonerry

Fake News

Information and/or the reporting of facts that Donald Trump disagrees with/wishes could be suppressed.

Hey, if spouting demonstrably false information is good enough for the Pres' and his pals then why not give it a spin?

Keepin' it (((PREZYDENSHUL))) son!

I wonder when libtards are going to come up with an actual plan to put a valid candidate into office instead of whining that they lost the election. All that college education hasn't helped them win many spots in US government these days.

Got this sticker at a concert the other night.

Sixty-eight times Trump promised to repeal 'Obamacare'...

thinkprogress.org/trump-promised-to-repeal-obamacare-many-times-ab9500dad31e

Trump is and idiot and a joke.
If he wasn't rich he would of been in jail for all that

Yup... quite a few. Sad!

The piece of shit has less supporters then he thinks.

"maybe we'll have another opportunity to invade Iraq and finally take their oil, then reminded them how bad the media is."

I hope it's thinly veiled sarcasm. At least, that's the way it comes across to me. I'm sure you're aware that that line/accusation ("we're there for the oil") didn't originate from Trump. Likely, he's taking their own words, what many commentators in the media said (years ago) and mocking how it turned out to be false (thereby, demonstrating "how bad the media is").

The Iraq war was a mistake for other reasons and the mission was not accomplished. But still, we can learn from history and the false narratives being spread by media... recall the conspiracies saying that Bush was behind 9/11, that he was the master-mind who orchestrated the whole event to fabricate justification for the wars. Fast forward to today and we're being served up another outlandish conspiracy, this time saying that Trump was working with the Russians to change the outcome of the elections. Sure sounds like a conspiracy. But I'll wait for the evidence before jumping to conclusions.



"It's not healthy to let an extreme portion of one party make all of the decisions without any checks and balances."

"extreme portion" Please elaborate. Are you saying all 'pubs currently in office are extreme right-wing nutjobs?

Checks & balances (division of govt) is still there (3 main branches are there), even if to lesser degree when 1 party controls all branches... the founding fathers didn't set up any structure to prevent 1 party from winning all branches.

Regardless, not sure if you have a point here, because Trump and the Republicans in Congress are always bickering with each other. Trump isn't getting his every wish and hasn't been able to change much. You're talking about things he'd like to do, but how much can he really change when even a Republican Congress doesn't support him and the courts declare his bans & such unconstitutional? He might be a successful businessman. But so far, he's been ineffective as a politician.



"wanting to block entry based on religion"

Source? Sounds like leftist propaganda. How many countries did he propose to restrict immigration for? 6 is what I've seen. If blocking entry were based on religion, there would be more than 6 countries to restrict. There are many more than 6 countries with a majority population of Muslims, are there not?



"a tariff on Mexican products"

A tariff is tax on the exporter. I get what you're saying (that prices would rise, so it'd be like a tax). But no, it's not the same as a tax on citizens. Tariffs make it less attractive to manufacture sh!t elsewhere. The goal behind it is fewer companies closing shop in the U.S. and moving to Mexico.

Besides, free trade (as it's currently practiced) is over-rated. I've been saying for years that "free trade" isn't really free. Overall, the U.S. doesn't benefit from it. Mainly, the 1% benefit. Have you seen our trade deficit? For a while, it's been over $120 billion every quarter. The rate that our economy is bleeding cash through trade is insane and corrections need to happen (if we don't make some changes, economies will eventually correct themselves, in the form of a huge crash).

Cheap prices is what we're sold on. But in reality, the primary beneficiary of "free trade" is Wal-Mart and corporate America. They're making billions in profit through abusive labor practices. By setting up factories in other countries, they get out of paying minimum wage and skirt basic worker rights. If we really want to level the playing field and be fair about free trade, then we should create laws saying that other nations can only be granted most-favored trading status (immune to tariffs and restrictions) by adopting our laws (minimum wage and workers rights) in their own countries.

On healthcare, I tend to agree that many of the European countries have a better system.

For most sectors of the economy, free markets are great. But when I think of healthcare in the U.S., I can't help but think of a term i was taught Econ 101 - "inelastic demand" - which more or less means that demand doesn't change with changing supply (or price).
It's a relevant term here, because healthcare is a service that ppl require, and literally can't live without. Demand is inflexible for healthcare and the principle of inelastic demand takes hold. Healthcare providers can charge whatever the hell they want and ppl will pay. The usual concept in economics, that changes in free market demand affecting price doesn't apply to our current system of healthcare... because demand doesn't go down (only up, as the population increases and gets older, average). Invariably, prices will continue to rise at seemingly obscene rates under such a system.