Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2018 20:02:37 GMT -5
A guy commenting on other guys' level of attractiveness is..  |
|
|
|
Post by Emig5m on Dec 26, 2018 23:03:28 GMT -5
A guy commenting on other guys' level of attractiveness is..
And man some arcade games where so cringe..... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2019 19:33:51 GMT -5
It's hard to think straight with all your blood in that throbbing retard in your pants... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2019 3:54:01 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2019 23:06:22 GMT -5
Role reversal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cop on Mar 12, 2019 11:07:23 GMT -5
That's awful. I certainly hope something like that never happens to me...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2019 14:58:15 GMT -5
All things considered (at our ages and such), if something like that were to happen, it'd be more likely that she'd be after your sperm & money than love & attention. And if you have no money, you don't have to worry about such "bad luck" befalling you. lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2019 10:05:49 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2019 15:20:52 GMT -5
If men acted like women reality tv (with Will Ferrell)..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 18:50:53 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2019 23:44:56 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2019 19:48:01 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2019 18:09:53 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2019 19:50:23 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2019 22:47:15 GMT -5
And it's funny because there's truth to it. The above depiction more or less outlines a major problem (particularly in western societies) i.e. men not owning up to themselves and taking responsibility, much less for their communities. Instead, blaming external factors for their woes or, otherwise, making excuses for not having relationships with women or involvement with their communities. But that's not to say that many women aren't messed up too, or that PC culture isn't getting out of hand. In all likelihood, these issues are probably all interconnected. I agree 100%. I find the whole "manosphere"(Incel/Redpill/MGTOW) thing fascinating because I can relate to some of the things they say and I could have easily been one of those "Incel" dudes if I had a worse mentality when I was younger. I remember being 14 and being jealous when girls would talk about "hot guys" and realizing I didn't have any of those qualities. I could have become crazy bitter and went on the internet and lashed out but I didn't. I never tried to date the hottest girl in the room because I knew I wasn't the hottest guy in the room. A common complaint from "manosphere" types is women go for "buff chads". Put yourself in a woman's shoes. A large buff male would better be able to protect you and your young if shit goes down. It indicates health, similarly to a woman not wanting a pasty dude with huge purple bags under his eyes. Being a pasty zombie does not indicate good health. Also being massively fat is not healthy either. From an evolutionary perspective it makes 100% for women to want large buff athletic dudes. In my early 20s I stared hitting the gym 5 days a week and it did wonders for my looks and women reacted a lot better to me. Then I went from dating average looking girls to pretty girls since my "SMV" went up as Redpillers like to say: https://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/2e2zqk/guys_who_have_raised_their_smv_give_me_the_before/ So then the manosphere types will be like "AH HA! SEE!?!?!?! THEY ONLY LIKED YOU CUZ OF YOUR MUSCLES WOMEN ARE SUCH SHALLOW BITCHES! 100% PROOF!!!!" Yet all those same dudes who say that lust after pretty girls and never morbidly obese acne ridden ugly girls. Total hypocrisy. Also if you watch some of those manosphere youtube videos you can see many of those guys are terribly awkward and have no social skills at all. Learning social skills is on an individual and you can't blame women for not being interested if you literally cannot talk to girls at all. Fix your shit first before the woman hating. Basically when manosphere types make these long videos with all these "deep and profound insights" on the nature of women I am reminded of this: EI makes an interesting point about how sexual market place standards for men have changed over the decades. In current times, a man needs to get buff and become financially successful (be in the top 20% or so) to attract an average woman. That simply wasn't the case in the boomer generation or earlier. My own parents are a case in point. As well as many of my uncles and their wives. So this defeats the argument that women always only went for men in tip-top shape or that's always been some sort of biological imperative for women. Also, something he didn't cover, the standards are changing for women too (from the feminist pov that is). "Fat is beautiful" i.e. a fat woman is beautiful, according to the current feminist-driven media propaganda. These changes are likely rooted in the deregulation of the sexual marketplace that CRP discussed in a previous vid I linked. He blames feminism and male white-knighting. But it's also modern technology (social media & dating apps). Obviously, these dating apps allow women to sift through men at record speeds, never thought possible just a couple of decades ago. This tech, along with divorce laws that overwhelmingly favor women, makes it so there's virtually no upper limit to female hypergamy. Women go for the highest status male/s they see as being available. Social media makes tons of more guys available to women. Therefore, social media works against most average guys, since females typically seek out the best they find available to them. This is why it's generally not a good idea for men to rely on social media and dating sites/app to find women. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2019 17:23:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2019 20:32:39 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2019 13:26:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2019 17:12:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2019 10:22:25 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2019 15:43:40 GMT -5
Lately, it seems there's been multiple cases every week of men being accused by women. I've only posted some fraction of them. Of course, only the high profile cases (of rich & famous men) make it to mainstream media.
Here's one that occurred in Brazil. Well, the alleged incident occurred Brazil, two weeks prior to the (still anonymous) woman/accuser notifying authorities in Europe.
Brazilian guys in the comments are saying that MGTOW is spreading fast in their country. Looks like MGTOW has become a global phenomenon.
I've seen how YT and other social media have been censoring the "Manosphere" online (vis-a-vis demonetizing and shutting down content creators). Evidently, free speech ain't progressive enough for the far left (particularly, those with social media tech giants). I can certainly understand their fear tho, since men turning their backs on marriage (to the state and women) in massive droves has the potential to disrupt feminist/leftist agendas and the (the hundreds of billions of $'s) divorce court industry. Actually, (fewer people marrying) is bad news for consumerism overall, since much of women's spending is based on husbands' incomes (and women are responsible for something like 2/3 of consumer spending). This could be why they keep harping on the (proven non-existent) "gender pay gap" and trying to make it so women are paid more (for working lesser jobs and fewer hours). Because they know women are the primary consumers and they'll need to transfer wealth to those consumers in order to keep spending up (and thus, keep the economy growing. i.e. continued wealth xfer from the bottom 99% to the top 1%). Truly insidious if that turns out to be the case. I'll probably flee to some other country if things get much worse here for men.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cop on Jun 4, 2019 11:24:52 GMT -5
Yeah, and Ronaldo has a signed confession that he (anally) raped a woman but it doesn't seem like that's holding him back all that much. He's still the face of the Fifa game-franchise and in all kinds of spots for Nike (I'm guessing it's Nike). Whenever he comes up in conversation (a few of my colleagues are soccer fans), I always refer to him as 'that rapist', lol...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2019 11:44:44 GMT -5
Yeah, and Ronaldo has a signed confession that he (anally) raped a woman but it doesn't seem like that's holding him back all that much. He's still the face of the Fifa game-franchise and in all kinds of spots for Nike (I'm guessing it's Nike). Whenever he comes up in conversation (a few of my colleagues are soccer fans), I always refer to him as 'that rapist', lol... If your legal systems are anything like the U.S., he probably paid a heap of cash to plaintiff/victim to settle the case and convince them to not file criminal charges. In the O. J. Simpson murder case, there was both a criminal trial and civil trial. He won the criminal trial and lost the civil trail. So he paid $'s, but no jail. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._J._Simpson#Nicole_Brown_Simpson_and_Ron_Goldman_murders_and_trials |
|
|
|
Post by Cop on Jun 4, 2019 12:38:24 GMT -5
If your legal systems are anything like the U.S., Thankfully, no. Sure, that kept him out of jail, but by now we all know it did happen, and EA knows, and Nike knows, but they continue to pay him insane amounts of money to put his face on their shit. |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jun 4, 2019 13:00:36 GMT -5
Sure, that kept him out of jail, but by now we all know it did happen, and EA knows, and Nike knows, but they continue to pay him insane amounts of money to put his face on their shit. This is less about the modern "SJW vs Anti-SJW" and #MeToo and more about the idiotic cult of the athlete. I don't watch any sports besides UFC and don't give a fuck about famous athletes. Jerry Sandusky was allowed to rape boys for years and years because he was a football coach and we just gotta have our football before anything else in the USA. To the point that districts in Texas can have trouble affording books and other academic necessities but they have brand new football stadiums. Its really disgusting. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2019 13:09:37 GMT -5
Sure, that kept him out of jail, but by now we all know it did happen, and EA knows, and Nike knows, but they continue to pay him insane amounts of money to put his face on their shit. This is less about the modern "SJW vs Anti-SJW" and #MeToo and more about the idiotic cult of the athlete. I don't watch any sports besides UFC and don't give a fuck about famous athletes. Jerry Sandusky was allowed to rape boys for years and years because he was a football coach and we just gotta have our football before anything else in the USA. To the point that districts in Texas can have trouble affording books and other academic necessities but they have brand new football stadiums. Its really disgusting. "idiotic cult of the athlete" True. It's ingrained in our culture on so many levels. We're weened on it, starting with children in public school systems or sooner (if the parents so choose). imo, as with most things in human society, the motivation (behind the culture, organizations, and so on) is rooted in money. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2019 13:15:26 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2019 18:39:02 GMT -5
I've seen how YT and other social media have been censoring the "Manosphere" online (vis-a-vis demonetizing and shutting down content creators). Evidently, free speech ain't progressive enough for the far left (particularly, those with social media tech giants). I can certainly understand their fear tho, since men turning their backs on marriage (to the state and women) in massive droves has the potential to disrupt feminist/leftist agendas and the (the hundreds of billions of $'s) divorce court industry. Actually, (fewer people marrying) is bad news for consumerism overall, since much of women's spending is based on husbands' incomes (and women are responsible for something like 2/3 of consumer spending). This could be why they keep harping on the (proven non-existent) "gender pay gap" and trying to make it so women are paid more (for working lesser jobs and fewer hours). Because they know women are the primary consumers and they'll need to transfer wealth to those consumers in order to keep spending up (and thus, keep the economy growing. i.e. continued wealth xfer from the bottom 99% to the top 1%). Truly insidious if that turns out to be the case. I'll probably flee to some other country if things get much worse here for men. They've gone to Defcon 5. lol Left-leaning social media sites are in full panic mode and going ballistic on MGTOW content creators, deleting their channels & profiles. |
|
|
|
Post by Emig5m on Jun 5, 2019 21:28:32 GMT -5
I've seen how YT and other social media have been censoring the "Manosphere" online (vis-a-vis demonetizing and shutting down content creators). Evidently, free speech ain't progressive enough for the far left (particularly, those with social media tech giants). I can certainly understand their fear tho, since men turning their backs on marriage (to the state and women) in massive droves has the potential to disrupt feminist/leftist agendas and the (the hundreds of billions of $'s) divorce court industry. Actually, (fewer people marrying) is bad news for consumerism overall, since much of women's spending is based on husbands' incomes (and women are responsible for something like 2/3 of consumer spending). This could be why they keep harping on the (proven non-existent) "gender pay gap" and trying to make it so women are paid more (for working lesser jobs and fewer hours). Because they know women are the primary consumers and they'll need to transfer wealth to those consumers in order to keep spending up (and thus, keep the economy growing. i.e. continued wealth xfer from the bottom 99% to the top 1%). Truly insidious if that turns out to be the case. I'll probably flee to some other country if things get much worse here for men. They've gone to Defcon 5. lol Left-leaning social media sites are in full panic mode and going ballistic on MGTOW content creators, deleting their channels & profiles. Unreal....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2019 23:37:52 GMT -5
He's right about it not being about (exclusively) banning Republicans (or red pill/MGTOW ideology for that matter). It's about banning any expression that doesn't support the left and its warped narrative (of separating people into various categories, including brand new genders). Anybody with a fair amount of reason sees that it's about manipulating people to vote Democrat vis-à-vis creating various victim classes with varying legal protections & societal benefits (i.e. giving out diversity "carrots", so to speak, for voting Democrat). Clearly, this is not true equality across the board for all individuals.
Stefan Molyneux mentioned similar problems with his channel and subscribers dropping off due to the YT algorithm. Stefan isn't even MGTOW or Republican. He's pro-anarchy, pro-capitalist. Simply put, he's saying things that don't fit the left-wing narrative, and so he's punished for it. I don't follow his particular set of beliefs. But at the same time, I don't think all beliefs but one should be suppressed either. That's not Democratic. Funny that. Democrats being un-democratic.
Sandman mentioned there's currently an anti-trust case in progress in the U.S. (to fight for freedom of speech on the internet, I presume).
|
|
