I don't get it... / General Political Bitching Thread....lol

The only differences here are that Biden charters flights scheduled to land in the dark of night and conceal what he's doing, whilst the governor sends them by bus (saving the taxpayer money) and speaks openly with the public about it.

Ever since I started paying attention to politics in the early-mid 1990s you could always rely on the Republican Party to the the part of big business, bankers would be the most stereotypical Republican constituents then I read this nonsense:
archive.ph/JRW5a




So wait educated bankers don't want to come off like ignorant bigoted hillbillies and that is a bad thing? I mean even if they only give lip service which no doubt many of them are. I like how he talks about "uber-woke" without defining the term, at this point what does being "anti-woke" even mean besides being a dog whistle big tent for all forms of bigotry?

Anyway we have government officials telling big businessmen what do say in stark contrast to the last 30 years of Republicans saying they want "smaller government"

Surrounding yourself with Asian people while speaking about CCP problems, so that Democrats don't pull out the racist card. 4D chess. lol

That's cool that you get it. Although, maybe his discussion goes a level deeper than that. imo, he's nonchalantly calling out the mainstream left (in general) for defending them, not speaking out about human rights abuses stemming from hardline Muslim ideology/religion, and therefore not standing by their own g'damn principles.

"Putin puppets" are saying this was done to lock EU countries into the conflict, on the side of the US.

With "no more Nordstream pipeline" (as Biden himself stated would happen quite a while ago), Russia has nothing to bargain for peace. But nah, we're supposed to believe that Biden is a fortune teller and Putin sabotaged his own pipeline.

I have a nasty feeling that the MIC in effect offered Ukraine to Russia in exchange for their pipeline getting destroyed, with Russia not retaliating, and now Europe, especially Germany, becoming economically and politically utterly dependent on the United States, especially its fuel supply. Additionally that would mean investors would want dollars, and American stocks, as Europe looked like it was failing. And the petrodollar might also get saved, for now. With America calling the shots in Europe, China could get shut out, and there'd be fewer voices to protest as America dominated its hemisphere.

"No NATO for you!" should mean that Russia gets to use Ukraine's military like a chew toy, and America supplies Ukraine with only intel, and just enough advanced missiles so that they get a good handle on Russia's abilities, and can plausibly claim after Ukraine has to capitulate that America did all it could. I don't see America shipping its best tanks to Ukraine, and that's about the only source left for good ones, as our military would scream at not having them, and the public would scream to see Russia turn them into incredibly expensive junk heaps as untrained Ukrainian crews lacked the training to properly use them, and Russia leveraged its other large advantages against them.

"You want Ukraine, well, here is our price." being what America was communicating to Russia, with America having already started taking its cut. Senator Rand Paul voted for more aid while pleading can we just keep track of what's getting sent, and he was in effect ignored.

If the above is true expect massive grifting as aid gets sent to rebuild Ukraine, and massive exploitation of the rump state it would become.

"Sign here, President Zelenskyy, and sign here, here, here, and .... here."

But then again, Putin might not be having any of that, and could be keeping his counsel on what Russia will be doing in the days and years ahead.