|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Apr 27, 2018 1:50:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 1, 2018 21:28:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cop on May 2, 2018 11:34:43 GMT -5
Someone here should get a kick out of this...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2018 19:20:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 5, 2018 20:23:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 8, 2018 20:56:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 9, 2018 19:47:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Coolverine on May 10, 2018 23:41:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 11, 2018 23:29:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 13, 2018 12:49:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 14, 2018 16:45:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Emig5m on May 14, 2018 20:16:10 GMT -5
Someone here should get a kick out of this... Me? hehe. Been busy...haven't been on the boards much lately.... |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 15, 2018 9:16:27 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2018 12:14:52 GMT -5
Can't fix stupid. My theory is that many SJW's are full of anger (and "triggered" so easily) because they actually think of themselves as unattractive (though, they claim the opposite, like the person that vid) and likely envy the beautiful people that mass media & Hollywood constantly bombards us with. Seems to be case based on some of their comments I've read.. I was reading comments below a Youtube vid/analysis of Joi's character from the Blade Runner 2049 movie. In the comments, many "triggered" SJW's claiming how offensive Joi's character was to females, due to the character being overly compliant & nice to K (her "man", so to speak.. though he's technically not a man, but a "replicant" in the film... and Joi's technically not even a woman, but an AI). Also, they are extremely offended by the character's nudity, saying it exploits women and it's harmful to young girls. I hope not though, since the movie is rated R and parents shouldn't be allowing their children to watch it in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 15, 2018 12:21:41 GMT -5
Can't fix stupid. My theory is that many SJW's are full of anger (and "triggered" so easily) because they actually think of themselves as unattractive (though, they claim the opposite, like the person that vid) and likely envy the beautiful people that mass media & Hollywood constantly bombards us with. Seems to be case based on some of their comments I've read.. I was reading comments below a Youtube vid/analysis of Joi's character from the Blade Runner 2049 movie. In the comments, many "triggered" SJW's claiming how offensive Joi's character was to females, due to the character being overly compliant & nice to K (her "man", so to speak.. though he's technically not a man, but a "replicant" in the film... and Joi's technically not even a woman, but an AI). Also, they are extremely offended by the character's nudity, saying it exploits women and it's harmful to young girls. I hope not though, since the movie is rated R and parents shouldn't be allowing their children to watch it in the first place. I'm very liberal I just enjoy laughing at troll videos lol. Also millions of genders? Wha? |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 15, 2018 14:18:28 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2018 22:21:01 GMT -5
Can't fix stupid. My theory is that many SJW's are full of anger (and "triggered" so easily) because they actually think of themselves as unattractive (though, they claim the opposite, like the person that vid) and likely envy the beautiful people that mass media & Hollywood constantly bombards us with. Seems to be case based on some of their comments I've read.. I was reading comments below a Youtube vid/analysis of Joi's character from the Blade Runner 2049 movie. In the comments, many "triggered" SJW's claiming how offensive Joi's character was to females, due to the character being overly compliant & nice to K (her "man", so to speak.. though he's technically not a man, but a "replicant" in the film... and Joi's technically not even a woman, but an AI). Also, they are extremely offended by the character's nudity, saying it exploits women and it's harmful to young girls. I hope not though, since the movie is rated R and parents shouldn't be allowing their children to watch it in the first place. I'm very liberal I just enjoy laughing at troll videos lol. Also millions of genders? Wha? |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 15, 2018 23:13:52 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2018 11:05:23 GMT -5
Looks like some good shit, bro. Let's make it legal!
/sarcasm
Opioids (like Heroin) produce this sort of catatonic state.
Other side effects include:
Unemployed/homeless
Acute addiction, to the point that all he/she cares about is getting the next fix.
Loss of friends/family (due the addiction - cheating, stealing, lying to, and sometimes even murder.. including doing these things to those closest to you, in order to get the money for the next fix).
Death from OD - you stop breathing (die from asphyxiation) or, if you unknowingly use an especially lethal synthetic copy of the drug imported from China, your heart explodes.
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 16, 2018 18:12:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 16, 2018 20:38:05 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2018 16:02:24 GMT -5
Can't fix stupid. My theory is that many SJW's are full of anger (and "triggered" so easily) because they actually think of themselves as unattractive (though, they claim the opposite, like the person that vid) and likely envy the beautiful people that mass media & Hollywood constantly bombards us with. Seems to be case based on some of their comments I've read.. I was reading comments below a Youtube vid/analysis of Joi's character from the Blade Runner 2049 movie. In the comments, many "triggered" SJW's claiming how offensive Joi's character was to females, due to the character being overly compliant & nice to K (her "man", so to speak.. though he's technically not a man, but a "replicant" in the film... and Joi's technically not even a woman, but an AI). Also, they are extremely offended by the character's nudity, saying it exploits women and it's harmful to young girls. I hope not though, since the movie is rated R and parents shouldn't be allowing their children to watch it in the first place. I'm very liberal I just enjoy laughing at troll videos lol. Also millions of genders? Wha? It's utter nonsense, maybe even to the point of some form of radicalism. However, if i were to try & make any rational sense out of her words, it might be that she's subconsciously grasping for the idea of individualism (i.e. every person is a unique individual with rights and every single individual should have equal rights). Such thinking is actually conservative, at least insofar that it runs counter to modern liberal identity politics. Because if every individual deserves 100% equal rights under the law, then the Democrats wouldn't be able to justify grouping people into categories, creating favored legal classes of people or writing specific laws to grant specific protections to certain classes. Problem with her line of thinking & trying to make it mesh with liberal politics, is that creating too many subcategories of protected classes would result in massive ineffective bureaucracy and dilute how the resources can be reallocated (i.e. your personal favored class would no longer derive much benefit, if any). Mainstream liberals should watch out for people like her.  |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 17, 2018 19:47:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 17, 2018 19:50:16 GMT -5
It's utter nonsense, maybe even to the point of some form of radicalism. However, if i were to try & make any rational sense out of her words, it might be that she's subconsciously grasping for the idea of individualism (i.e. every person is a unique individual with rights and every single individual should have equal rights). Such thinking is actually conservative, at least insofar that it runs counter to modern liberal identity politics. Because if every individual deserves 100% equal rights under the law, then the Democrats wouldn't be able to justify grouping people into categories, creating favored legal classes of people or writing specific laws to grant specific protections to certain classes. Problem with her line of thinking & trying to make it mesh with liberal politics, is that creating too many subcategories of protected classes would result in massive ineffective bureaucracy and dilute how the resources can be reallocated (i.e. your personal favored class would no longer derive much benefit, if any). Mainstream liberals should watch out for people like her. I kinda agree with what the guy said. She doesn't like being seen as a woman because of what that implies socially. For example. If a man likes to wear makeup and dresses and prance around he would get a huge backlash and depending on where he is might even be beaten or killed. However if social norms were different it wouldn't be a big deal. Hence when he said change the expectation. Changing the gender expectations makes more sense then "millions of genders". How about there are two genders or no gender and people can act however they please? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2018 11:34:53 GMT -5
It's utter nonsense, maybe even to the point of some form of radicalism. However, if i were to try & make any rational sense out of her words, it might be that she's subconsciously grasping for the idea of individualism (i.e. every person is a unique individual with rights and every single individual should have equal rights). Such thinking is actually conservative, at least insofar that it runs counter to modern liberal identity politics. Because if every individual deserves 100% equal rights under the law, then the Democrats wouldn't be able to justify grouping people into categories, creating favored legal classes of people or writing specific laws to grant specific protections to certain classes. Problem with her line of thinking & trying to make it mesh with liberal politics, is that creating too many subcategories of protected classes would result in massive ineffective bureaucracy and dilute how the resources can be reallocated (i.e. your personal favored class would no longer derive much benefit, if any). Mainstream liberals should watch out for people like her. I kinda agree with what the guy said. She doesn't like being seen as a woman because of what that implies socially. For example. If a man likes to wear makeup and dresses and prance around he would get a huge backlash and depending on where he is might even be beaten or killed. However if social norms were different it wouldn't be a big deal. Hence when he said change the expectation. Changing the gender expectations makes more sense then "millions of genders". How about there are two genders or no gender and people can act however they please? Many women are proud of their femininity and ppl like the woman in that vid would oppose other womens' freedom of expression, by saying the use of gender pronouns (he/she) is hate crime, etc. If women are still viewed as inferior socially, we should oppose & fight those bigoted views. If it's about negative social perceptions of being a woman, then redefining gender (or denying one's own gender) is a lazy way to go about it, imo. But at the same time, I do agree people should be free to be themselves and not have to worry about being judged based on social categories. |
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 19, 2018 11:06:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 21, 2018 15:09:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 22, 2018 21:50:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 23, 2018 12:21:54 GMT -5
20 years yesterday
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2018 13:13:26 GMT -5
The only reason people love this movie is because it's Star Wars and, despite its many flaws, it's still better than the prequels. I can forgive the cheese (Porgs aka. "discount Ewoks" lol, new far-fetched force powers, and lack of Newtonian physics). It's the massive plot holes and weak story-telling that make it bad. I was wondering about some of the same things the first time I watched it. What are Snoke's origins and why kill him off never having even hinted at, much less explained those origins? Why did Luke leave a map (and in such a premeditated way, splitting the map in pieces, that would've taken some effort) if he didn't want to be found? One thing that's a stretch in that critique is that the caretakers are slaves. There's no indication that they're being forced to do anything against their will. If anything, a better comparison would be that they're like Buddhist monks. I know we live in a PC, hyper-sensitive culture, but jeesh. |
|
