|
Post by Cop on Apr 12, 2020 12:26:41 GMT -5
We're a few weeks ahead of you in Europe as far as the virus is concerned, but so far we've not needed any guns to defend ourselves from roaming gangs... ...then again, we're not as crazy as most of you seem to be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2020 13:37:08 GMT -5
I'm middle-aged and don't suffer from agoraphobia. I frequent parks and public areas in every state I've lived in or visited.. Yet, I've never been attacked by a roaming gang nor had a gun pointed at me. Therefore, I wager most of us are pacifists.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2020 14:21:21 GMT -5
The panic shopping and hoarding mentally here is crazy though (TP, sanitizers, guns & ammo). I think many people (conservatards & libtards alike) watched too much reality tv/Doomsday prep, and let it go to their heads. lol
Still, I haven't seen people rioting in the streets or an increase in violence due to the pandemic. I don't watch the news all the time though, so maybe you've seen something I haven't. My assessment is based mostly on my personal experiences when I've gone out and about.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Apr 12, 2020 15:26:50 GMT -5
Imagine thinking the Democrats engineered a virus to make Trump look bad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2020 16:20:56 GMT -5
Imagine thinking the Democrats engineered a virus to make Trump look bad. About half the population has an IQ of less than 100. That's an IQ probably too low to understand how viruses work, much less that scientists around the world could determine if the virus was engineered. Admittedly, I could see reason for many govt's wanting to hide such info (because people panic and others want war if our enemies were engineering & unleashing bioweapons). However, it's data that could be verified by many sources and leaked easily, so cover-ups or attempts at actual conspiracy are fairly pointless.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Apr 12, 2020 23:09:06 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2020 12:20:46 GMT -5
The media are morons for referring to it as the Coronavirus in most of their reporting. Technically, it's correct. However, people get colds from Coronavirus EVERY year. The strain of Coronavirus causing this current pandemic is unusual and very different, because they say it likely jumped from bats to pangolins, and then from pangolins to humans, resulting in a far deadlier strain. Referring to it as simply Coronavirus all the time will result in undo panic whenever people refer to any strain of Coronavirus (including the more classical strains with low mortality rates). The virus should be referred to as something else - COVID-19, CoronaChan, WooFlu. They should just give it a unique name and stick to using that name. lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2020 0:36:30 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2020 6:17:22 GMT -5
Well, it's official. China attempted a cover-up (delayed & stalled the fight against the spread), and cost thousands of lives. Even your liberal news media is finally reporting some truth about the C-19 origins and why the situation is much worse than it should have been.. www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/special-report-chinas-deadly-coronavirus-cover-up/ar-BB12bnMG Of course, they're finally admitting what people with common sense knew all along, like the person who created this thread knew a couple of months ago. Fucking China/CCP always up to no good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2020 6:45:52 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2020 21:36:40 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2020 23:12:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Emig5m on May 6, 2020 21:18:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 6, 2020 21:34:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 9, 2020 11:34:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Emig5m on May 10, 2020 0:31:48 GMT -5
So when bill gates, someone who thinks the world is overpopulated says that that he wants to control population with vaccines how do you interpret that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2020 7:58:42 GMT -5
So when bill gates, someone who thinks the world is overpopulated says that that he wants to control population with vaccines how do you interpret that? The population control is mostly targeted at the middle-class in first-world economies because these are the people with enough education and influence to keep the elites somewhat in check. Remove us from the picture, then they have free reign to do anything they want. They don't give a rat's ass about the extreme poor in 3rd world countries, who don't know much about what's going on in the world and struggle to survive day to day.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 10, 2020 8:37:42 GMT -5
So when bill gates, someone who thinks the world is overpopulated says that that he wants to control population with vaccines how do you interpret that? He is 100% correct. In 3rd World Countries and it used to be in the West up until the 20th Century it was normal for plenty of kids to die before their 5th birthday. People would have a lot of kids because they didn't know how many would survive. Lots of kids = lots of poverty. Some animals in the animal kingdom I think like Starfish will have massive amounts of offspring. This is called being Philoprogenitive in scientific terms. I learned that in Anthropology. Now look at the modern West. The dream is supposedly the nuclear family 2 kids and a big yellow dog yadda yay. So if you can get people clean water, vaccines, and medical care they will have less kids because they know they will survive which leads to less poverty. See I knew that all off the top of my head. And they say college is a waste of money. lol.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 10, 2020 9:10:02 GMT -5
Also speaking of Bill Gates why not make him President. I mean if people will vote for the Idiot in Chief Trump and his light and disinfectant (LOL) why not get Bill in there? He is pro business as they come being the former richest man in the world before he gave a lot of it away. Also he is extremely smart.
I think thats the problem. He is too smart. The idiots who like to vote against their own interest would never go for him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2020 11:02:21 GMT -5
So when bill gates, someone who thinks the world is overpopulated says that that he wants to control population with vaccines how do you interpret that? He is 100% correct. In 3rd World Countries and it used to be in the West up until the 20th Century it was normal for plenty of kids to die before their 5th birthday. People would have a lot of kids because they didn't know how many would survive. Lots of kids = lots of poverty. Some animals in the animal kingdom I think like Starfish will have massive amounts of offspring. This is called being Philoprogenitive in scientific terms. I learned that in Anthropology. Now look at the modern West. The dream is supposedly the nuclear family 2 kids and a big yellow dog yadda yay.
So if you can get people clean water, vaccines, and medical care they will have less kids because they know they will survive which leads to less poverty.See I knew that all off the top of my head. And they say college is a waste of money. lol. I've said something similar before. However, when you guys frame it in the context of rich ppl like Gates (who has 3 kids) and Trump (who has 5 kids), that paints a different picture and made me reconsider. They're "boomers." Aka. Baby boomers, who most would argue are the wealthiest generation to date. Yet, they had lots of kids. Also, look at conservative & religious areas, like middle America or Utah, and it's common for well to do families to have lots of kids. So maybe it has just as much to do culture & family background/tradition (ppl who attend churches, who are more influenced by their communities and less influenced by mass media programming).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2020 13:30:10 GMT -5
College is a waste of money, imo. You spend more than half the time learning things you'll never use. All the useful stuff can be learned on the internet for free.
Anthropology is a pseudoscience. As is economics and many other subjects/degrees. Typically, it's a waste of time & money to pursue such degrees, since they don't offer the best employment prospects. They already have AI programs that outperform humans on many of these topics (law, economics/investing, psychology). True sciences include Chemistry, Biology, Physics, etc, which are well established fields of study and advanced enough that AI won't be displacing the related jobs anytime soon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2020 11:17:50 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2020 13:02:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 18, 2020 15:17:44 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2020 15:37:07 GMT -5
If his wife is as obese and unhealthy looking as him, she would be at high risk of dying from this virus (it mostly kills the elderly and immuno-compromised). In rare cases, conspiracies have some truth behind them. For example, the World Bank operates above & outside the control of governments, the ppl controlling it are not elected and have pretty much no transparency (answer to public or governments for nothing). Having such power just begs for abuse and opens the door to actual conspiracy. I'm very skeptical about the Coronavirus conspiracy theories though, including the one that says it was accidentally released from a bio-weapons lab in Wuhan. If that were true, the Chinese suck at engineering bio-weapons (because many naturally occurring diseases in recent history have had far higher mortality rates). However, it's highly likely they do have a bio-weapons program. The Russians openly admit they performed extensive bio-weapons research during the Cold War. Research and (potential) use of inhumane & internationally banned weapons are fairly typical for totalitarian regimes. I just find it unlikely that the CCP would intentionally release or be inept enough to accidentally release a virus that could potentially kill millions, because the backlash for such nefarious & evil actions could be retaliation/war.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2020 17:29:06 GMT -5
btw, govt's (Russia, formerly USSR, and the WWII Allies) were already exceedingly good at engineering bio-weapons by the 50's and so we gave up on it decades ago (via UN treaty/ban). They had realized how easy these weapons were to develop and how much destruction they could cause. The current Chinese govt/CCP aren't too bright if they're tinkering with viruses & bacteria for use as bio-weapons today... Such weapons can just as easily backfire and decimate your own populations, even if you have vaccine/s (viruses and certain bacteria tend to mutate rapidly).
A key event that motivated the UN ban on bioweapons (which I heard about from my Microbiology prof in college) was when the Allies had engineered a strain of Anthrax that they had tested on small, uninhabited island around the UK. To this day, the island is strictly quarantined and no human is allowed to set foot on it because the strain of anthrax they developed is extremely deadly. Also, anthrax is especially tough to get rid of because it's a bacteria and its primary home is ordinary soil. i.e. it doesn't require hosts to survive & spread, so the strict quarantine on the test island will probably remain in effect indefinitely. No doubt, scientists of that time warned the UN about this and they acted accordingly.
|
|
|
Post by Babel-17 on May 19, 2020 4:35:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on May 19, 2020 9:48:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Emig5m on May 20, 2020 20:23:56 GMT -5
I wouldn't trust Bill Gates no matter what you guys say...lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2020 23:52:04 GMT -5
I wouldn't trust Bill Gates no matter what you guys say...lol. Gates is above average intelligence, but he's not the genius many people think he is. He bought a software platform that somebody else built and turned it into a money maker. Gates' parents were rich and they gave him the seed money to start Microsoft. Also, he was in the right place at the right time, saw an opportunity and took it. He talks about this in the first chapter of his autobiography - i.e. that he found himself surrounded by smarter ppl while attending college before dropping out and being blessed with the right opportunities & luck. The true genius is Elon Musk. He's an actual engineer (completed college and built things), not that you couldn't be an engineer without a degree (just sayin, it's not one of those worthless, easy to get degrees). He started with next to nothing ($20k his dad gave him), built/programmed his own software, sold the business, built another business and sold it for billions, and now runs several multi-billion $ companies (working 80 to 100 hours per week).
|
|