|
Post by Cop on Oct 16, 2020 10:09:44 GMT -5
Some would consider that a racist statement. Not saying you're racist. Just sayin', people are sensitive and easily offended these days. It's not me saying it. It must be taken in context, as if the person interviewing that guy in the video asked it after his rant about how the white man is going extinct. Hell, who knows, maybe that's exactly what they said to suddenly make him go off like that. Personally, I'm all for mixing the races. The most goodlooking people are often a mix of some sort. If everyone was a shade of brown, maybe we'd finally be able to put all this racial nonsense to rest... ...yeah, right, it'd be shade-wars instead of race-wars.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2020 11:36:22 GMT -5
Some would consider that a racist statement. Not saying you're racist. Just sayin', people are sensitive and easily offended these days. It's not me saying it. It must be taken in context, as if the person interviewing that guy in the video asked it after his rant about how the white man is going extinct. Hell, who knows, maybe that's exactly what they said to suddenly make him go off like that. Personally, I'm all for mixing the races. The most goodlooking people are often a mix of some sort. If everyone was a shade of brown, maybe we'd finally be able to put all this racial nonsense to rest... ...yeah, right, it'd be shade-wars instead of race-wars.I'm a mixed race person. I'm not against mixing races or inter-racial marriages either. In fact, I've dated Latina women (and other races). That (the part I put in bold) seems to be the policy. Immigration policy of the US and western European countries is designed to bring in mostly brown skinned races.. not so many Asians or Africans, and least of all white races. Just visit any major city, look around and see for yourself. lol Sadly, you're right and that won't fix anything. The proof already exists in many other countries.. i.e. it's been "shade-wars" in Mexico (and other Latin America countries) and India for a looooong time. Although, I'm not even sure making everybody the same shade would solve racism. You see, most Americans are mixed race.. Often, mixing of white races that historically hated each other, even though they were all equally white (English & Irish, German & Polish, etc). Yeah, same shade ppl (of different races) can still be racist towards each other. However, I'm against race-based (identity politics) ideology that requires placing an emphasis on racial identities for purposes of segregation (on college campuses, etc), granting special privileges, or discrimination against any race/s over others (social engineering). Also, I'm against immigration policy as a means of altering demographics for the purposes gaining political power (a form of rigging elections and subverting Democracy, by pushing immigration on such a massive scale to try & change a country's cultural identity virtually overnight). Fact is, nobody does legal mass immigration on the scale of the US. We're literally the best and least racist on immigration policy. The leftist idea that we racist and we need open borders (support massive illegal immigration) is Tomfoolery. It's a race to bottom for the working class and serves to line the pockets of the rich (they get access to cheap labor and don't have to pay benefits). Actually, (business leaders & politicians) encouraging and allowing illegal immigration is a form of human rights abuse (with the motive of increasing profits or gaining political power, at the expense of human rights and quality of life of the working class). I say, if they're going to insist we need more immigration, simply increase the allowed number of legal immigrants (rather than illegal immigrants). Of course, they don't want that because they wouldn't profit from it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2020 12:20:38 GMT -5
Some would consider that a racist statement. Not saying you're racist. Just sayin', people are sensitive and easily offended these days. It's not me saying it. It must be taken in context, as if the person interviewing that guy in the video asked it after his rant about how the white man is going extinct. Hell, who knows, maybe that's exactly what they said to suddenly make him go off like that. "White man" is just a genetic mutation, since humans originated in Africa (we all started out as Africans). The "white skin" trait evolved due to eons of multi-generational geographic isolation at northern latitudes and humans' need for UV exposure to remain fit & survive (i.e. lighter skin helps w/ the body's Vitamin D production when UV exposure is limited). Thanks to modern travel, geographic isolation is uncommon and "white man" could eventually go away. In theory, the opposite thing could happen too, in the distant future. Remember the "I am Legend" movie with Will Smith. Suppose only black ppl, like Smith, had the gene/immunity to survive the zombie apocalypse. If these people moved to northern latitudes, given enough generations, they'd eventually evolve white skin too!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2020 14:26:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 16, 2020 20:43:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 17, 2020 11:15:32 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2020 11:41:23 GMT -5
Both candidates are low intelligence and low (real world) accomplishment. All Joe ever did before politics was play football in college, then entrenched in politics (for 40+ years). Trump was a trust fund baby (i.e. came from money) and lousy businessman (if what the media is saying is true and he's not hiding assets over seas). Clarey's "the Clarey Test" on Joe Biden (from a year ago, before Joe started showing signs of dementia). It's sad, because the Democrats had several potential great (intelligent and accomplished) nominees to choose from. But no, they had to go with the easily controlled, sold-out establishment candidate.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 18, 2020 11:01:53 GMT -5
It's sad, because the Democrats had several potential great (intelligent and accomplished) nominees to choose from. But no, they had to go with the easily controlled, sold-out establishment candidate. I'm not a big Biden guy I was a Sanders fan but he is also super old. Even if Biden is getting dementia like some say he has the democratic establishment backing him up, plus Trump has shown he isn't up to the job. Pete Buttigieg is still too young but in time could be a contender. I don't know if the US would vote for an openly gay man though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2020 15:23:52 GMT -5
It's sad, because the Democrats had several potential great (intelligent and accomplished) nominees to choose from. But no, they had to go with the easily controlled, sold-out establishment candidate. I'm not a big Biden guy I was a Sanders fan but he is also super old. Even if Biden is getting dementia like some say he has the democratic establishment backing him up, plus Trump has shown he isn't up to the job. Pete Buttigieg is still too young but in time could be a contender. I don't know if the US would vote for an openly gay man though. That's not even the first barrier. I doubt we'll get a good candidate (that isn't sold out to the corporations, China/CCP, and other foreign interests via their lobbyists & funding) from the DNC. They'll just keep throwing sold-out, establishment, status quo candidates at us to vote for. i.e. imo, voter choice is a delusion at this point. Of course, the Republicans (as a party) are just as bad when it comes to selling out America. Trump (supposedly fighting for America on trade deals) got in though. Although, it's quite possibly an act to appeal to middle-American/working class. Unemployment was improving before the covid lockdowns, but China's trade surplus was trending up as well. China's trade surplus over the past 10 years. tradingeconomics.com/china/balance-of-trade#:~:text=China%27s%20trade%20surplus%20with%20the%20US%20decreased%20to,by%200.5%20percent%20and%20imports%20falling%202.8%20percent.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 19, 2020 9:01:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 20, 2020 16:42:34 GMT -5
How do I get some of this Soros money? I'm already a YouTube partner sign me up lol
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 21, 2020 14:31:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Babel-17 on Oct 21, 2020 22:26:21 GMT -5
Right, since this looks to be getting debunked early, and to possibly be backfiring, we now have to wonder if this move to embarrass Trump was actually a move to help Trump. Well, actually, no, we don't have to wonder, but if polling shows this news helps Trump, there will be accusations of that.
Lol, Russia! spends peanuts on mischief, but gets portrayed as a major player in our elections. This eventually forces our government to impose sanctions, which means we later have to meet with Russia, and in exchange for going along with this farce of a narrative, they actually negotiate their way into coming out ahead.
Remember how under Obama and Trump we forced Russia to stop meddling with Ukraine? Me neither, because that never happened. But Russia for its part stays mum about the Trumps and the Bidens, and our political establishment appreciates that, same as they appreciated Russia not publicly chuckling about how corrupt Hillary arranged that uranium transfer to a Russian company.
Russia lets our politicians family and friends grift away in Russia while Russia stays mum, and Russia gets to go about its business.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2020 10:47:44 GMT -5
Right, since this looks to be getting debunked early, and to possibly be backfiring, we now have to wonder if this move to embarrass Trump was actually a move to help Trump. Well, actually, no, we don't have to wonder, but if polling shows this news helps Trump, there will be accusations of that.
Lol, Russia! spends peanuts on mischief, but gets portrayed as a major player in our elections. This eventually forces our government to impose sanctions, which means we later have to meet with Russia, and in exchange for going along with this farce of a narrative, they actually negotiate their way into coming out ahead.
Remember how under Obama and Trump we forced Russia to stop meddling with Ukraine? Me neither, because that never happened. But Russia for its part stays mum about the Trumps and the Bidens, and our political establishment appreciates that, same as they appreciated Russia not publicly chuckling about how corrupt Hillary arranged that uranium transfer to a Russian company.
Russia lets our politicians family and friends grift away in Russia while Russia stays mum, and Russia gets to go about its business.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/sep/17/missle-defence-shield-barack-obama
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 23, 2020 9:52:14 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2020 12:44:12 GMT -5
Sounds like the theory that she's been tacitly trolling the left, since entering politics, might actually be true. On the surface, her (above) statement is an attack on Trump. Yet, simultaneously, she's also confirming Trump's (debate) point that she lacks knowledge & experience on climate issues (by referencing her pre-politics background, waitressing, and nothing else). I looked up her wiki page to see if she at least has educational background on or related to environmental issues. She graduated from an expensive private university (Boston University - tuition is $58,000/year), and her degree was in International Relations & Economics. imo, the answer is no. Economics is a psuedo-science because it doesn't describe the laws of nature (it isn't actual science or observation of natural phenomena). Rather, it describes a human-made system (system of exhange). Economic systems are, at best, works in progress. It's definitively a works in progress because, if we had economics perfected and thoroughly understood, we wouldn't experience such frequent cyclical recessions/depressions. Environmental engineering, Electrical (w/ power systems) engineering, Civil engineering, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics are some of the more viable degree/career options to choose from (if Biden wins and the govt starts throwing trillions of $'s into green energy, as their plan suggests). As far as battling climate change, my advice would be to pump more $'s into nuclear R&D (first develop Thorium fission reactors, which are much safer and can't be exploited to produce weapons grade plutonium, and then eventually Hydrogen-based fusion reactors). Solar & wind are good for supplementing our energy needs, but by themselves, don't produce enough power to fulfill more than a fraction of our civilization's power needs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2020 13:59:44 GMT -5
This study/analysis doesn't bode well for green energy initiatives. After investing $3.6 trillion in green energy, contribution (% of total energy production) of wind & solar increased only a mere 2.5% and carbon emissions continued to rise regardless. www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4839/htmIt appears that diverting trillions of $'s into green energy isn't working and more drastic measures are needed to make any real impact. To be honest, Bill Gate's supposed "depopulation agenda" could be a realistic means of curbing CO2 production (i.e. the total # of humans on the planet, population growth, and consumerism are actually the root cause of the increased CO2 production). Of course, depopulation is already occurring in western "first world" countries, since our marriage & birth rates are at historic lows. Where population continues to explode is in developing nations. They'd need to figure out ways to control population in developing nations (i.e. the conspiracy theory that says Gate's vaccines serve a dual purpose of vaccinating and sterilizing people).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2020 13:40:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 28, 2020 12:25:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 29, 2020 9:08:11 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 12:34:59 GMT -5
The masks issue isn't black & white as your media and Democrat leaders would have you believe. You see, in this analogy, masks without the certified N95 rating are akin to coats without insulation material and/or a bunch of holes in them. Know what hospitals do when they test masks (imported from China) and find they don't meet the advertised standard? They burn those masks.. because, obviously, people working in hospitals are medical experts who know how determine what masks are actually effective. www.cnn.com/2020/04/01/business/n95-masks-counterfeits-supply-chain/index.html
|
|
|
Post by Cop on Oct 29, 2020 12:35:43 GMT -5
Those darn commie coat wearers!
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 29, 2020 12:55:47 GMT -5
The masks issue isn't black & white as your media and Democrat leaders would have you believe. m. Thats an interesting word choice. "Your media". Tell me I am really curious what is the media I should be following?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 13:16:53 GMT -5
The masks issue isn't black & white as your media and Democrat leaders would have you believe. m. Thats an interesting word choice. "Your media". Tell me I am really curious what is the media I should be following? The media in general. imo, don't take anything they say at face value. Exercise critical thinking. Media outlets are for-profit companies, so their primary goal is ratings to drive advertising $'s & profits. Reporting the truth is a distant second to that goal. If masks are a public health issue of utmost importance, like the quality of our prescription or over-the-counter drugs sold in pharmacies, why not require some quality standards (for the masks sold to the public, as they are doing in hospitals)? Do we allow the sale of made in (country X) medicines that don't meet FDA approval? No. Then why the phony narrative that if you're covering your face with anything you're good?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 13:22:53 GMT -5
Those darn commie coat wearers! The irony being that these "coats" are made in China (where CCP has minimum 50% ownership).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 14:10:10 GMT -5
The coat/mask analogy bugs me and sounds off, imo, because if even of a small amount of the virus gets through your mask, you'll likely get covid. Viruses multiply exponentially, so only one cell need be infected and you're screwed. Hence, why the N95 cert is so stringent (95%+ filtration requirement).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 22:28:01 GMT -5
Those darn commie coat wearers! The irony being that these "coats" are made in China (where CCP has minimum 50% ownership). Putin endorses Biden because, he says, "the Democratic Party is closer to the 'ideas' that birthed Communism". lol Even Chinese sources have stepped forward and confirmed the CCP/Biden connection. That's actually quite astonishing, considering how the CCP "disappears" people who speak negatively about the party. Yeah, it's likely that Trump's had business dealings in China too, even though he's apparently better at keeping it under wraps and out of public view compared to the Bidens. Nobody wants to admit to foreign (esp. financial) influence because ppl know that means corruption. Basically, choosing the lesser of two evils this election cycle is like choosing between Beelzebub or Satan.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Oct 31, 2020 18:09:01 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2020 18:28:27 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2020 19:33:32 GMT -5
imo, this is an issue currently hurting the Democrats election chances. I doubt that running on the gun control platform is going to be as effective this election cycle due to the widespread violence in major cities and the calls to "defund the police." Obviously, most people want a basic level of safety & security. When police across the country are disinclined to perform their duties (as demonstrated by the ongoing riots, many city & local govt's not speaking about de-escalating the violence and, rather, many of them ordering their PD's to stand down), people then seek to bolster their own self-defense abilities. This explains why gun sales have soared passed the records. Are these gun owners, including the unprecedented legions of first time gun owners, likely to vote to have their guns taken away? www.businessinsider.com/gun-purchase-attempts-first-time-buyers-rise-2020-ahead-election-2020-10
|
|