|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 24, 2019 12:36:48 GMT -5
Weird you posted that. Yesterday someone posted a Mesuggah video on reddit so I had a little youtube playlist of them playing in the background. Then I get a notification on my phone that this was posted on SCMB
|
|
|
Post by Cop on Jan 24, 2019 12:49:12 GMT -5
I was browsing some Bill Burr podcast youtube clips and he talked about them so I looked it up and I really liked this song. Reminded me a lot of some Fear Factory song I like.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 25, 2019 12:09:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 25, 2019 13:58:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Coolverine on Jan 25, 2019 17:44:20 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2019 18:47:07 GMT -5
Let's be honest. The main reason the Democrats have the majority of the black vote is due to the generous entitlements (if Democrats gave me free college, I'd vote Dem 99% of the time too). lol Black voters turning Republican is an interesting phenomenon. But that's not to say it's entirely nonsensical. I imagine many of them probably see the writing on the wall. The inevitability that white ppl are going to be just another minority in 2-3 decades and, as that's happening, fewer elected officials will be white. Then the dated ideology of white guilt/backpay & reparations owed to blacks fades away, and so do the entitlements. www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2018/03/14/the-us-will-become-minority-white-in-2045-census-projects/Edit: Even if all else remains equal (but we know it won't), we still have the $20+ trillion in national debt and soaring that will eventually force all sorts of budget cuts and partial govt shutdowns.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2019 19:08:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 26, 2019 11:22:35 GMT -5
Let's be honest. The main reason the Democrats have the majority of the black vote is due to the generous entitlements (if Democrats gave me free college, I'd vote Dem 99% of the time too). lol I think its less about entitlements and more about racism real or perceived. For example at the end of that little documentary they mention that republican senator tweeted "White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?" hence the black republican in the video distances herself from him. People will say blacks will play the "race card" but can you blame them with stuff like this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy"States rights" became a code word for reinforcing racism. I mean if a party literally devoted itself to making it hard for you to vote for decades wouldn't you oppose them?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2019 14:37:23 GMT -5
Let's be honest. The main reason the Democrats have the majority of the black vote is due to the generous entitlements (if Democrats gave me free college, I'd vote Dem 99% of the time too). lol I think its less about entitlements and more about racism real or perceived. For example at the end of that little documentary they mention that republican senator tweeted "White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?" hence the black republican in the video distances herself from him. People will say blacks will play the "race card" but can you blame them with stuff like this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy"States rights" became a code word for reinforcing racism. I mean if a party literally devoted itself to making it hard for you to vote for decades wouldn't you oppose them? " The Southern United States as defined by the Census Bureau In American politics, the Southern Strategy refers to a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.[1][2][3] As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States," When you go back that far (50's/60's), racism was pervasive in both major parties. So that Strategy would've worked, because it was indeed true that Democrats were generally racist at that time. Democrats were the favored party of the KKK. In the south, the Democrats were the dominant party up until that point (with all the segregation and other racist crap going on). The "Jim Crow" laws were passed by the Democrats! If you want to consider more recent times and be relevant to today, you could search bing and find plenty of racist quotes by Democrats. But obviously, it would be a flawed argument to say the whole party is racist by cherry picking quotes or incidents. That's why, in any debate on this topic, it's dangerous to accuse the modern Republican party as being racist on the whole, because they could simply throw cherry picked facts back in your face and accuse your party of the same. This reminds me of how elite Democrats (Obama, Pelosi, Zuckerberg, etc.) build walls around their personal properties for security, then at the same time protest border security at the national level claiming that it's all about racism.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 27, 2019 0:28:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 28, 2019 10:47:02 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2019 15:52:29 GMT -5
He's says it's nebulous and suggests the left has no such agenda. If that's true, then why do we see SJW (gay, transgenders, and non-sex/non-binary gender) displayed in all sorts of media (news, tv, movies, etc.). imo, anyone who doesn't see this has been hiding in a cave for the last decade at least. lol I believe that you pointed out in some other post a while ago about how the population of natural born citizens is on the decline and we need more immigration to keep the population levels up. Do you honestly believe that constantly bombarding ppl with media encouraging non-traditional family (or non-family) SJW lifestyles has no effect on population or birth rates? Or are you like the guy in the vid and in total denial that any such agenda exists? I just watched the movie " 1984" for the first time. Interesting movie. Sure, it's fiction and things maybe aren't quite as bad as this movie yet. However, it's eerily prophetic with the rampant Socialism, compelled speech/controlled language laws, destruction of the traditional family (so that it doesn't get in the way of loyalty to the state/party), spying on citizens (which Ed Snowden proved some years back), and the state/party staging false national crisis (pick & choose your crisis, whether Republicans or Democrats are in power). lol Edit: I suppose you could just as easily argue that it's an elitist agenda. i.e. the elites want the middle-class to die out, so they (the elite) can control 99% of the wealth & resources. Thus, they implement policies to decrease resident population growth and increase population growth of impoverished immigrants (lower-class, cheap labor who aren't competition or a threat). I suspect Trump only opposes illegal immigration on a temporary basis, because he read Rick Santorum's book and copied that guy's political playbook (appealing to working class middle-America) to win the election. So he'll keep up the charade 'til he's re-elected and only do so afterwards if he cares about his political legacy. It's evident in how he's handled his own businesses where, historically, he didn't have any qualms about outsourcing labor or hiring immigrants.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 28, 2019 18:14:38 GMT -5
He's says it's nebulous and suggests the left has no such agenda. If that's true, then why do we see SJW (gay, transgenders, and non-sex/non-binary gender) displayed in all sorts of media (news, tv, movies, etc.). imo, anyone who doesn't see this has been hiding in a cave for the last decade at least. lol I'm glad you have finally defined SJWs since from your posts on this forum you are very preoccupied with it. So you yourself just defined SJWs as LGBT. So I take it you oppose LGBT rights. So with all the problems in society and with concentration of wealth at the top your number one issue is "sticking it" to LGBT people. *yawn* As he said in this video being an "anti-SJW" is the core of your identity so you just oppose anything to do with SJWs and hence gays. In the 1990s is was "lol faggots", in the 2000s it was "I oppose the homosexual agenda" and now in the late 2010s its "I oppose the SJW agenda". Its the same old school thing dressed up in different language. That "agenda" is just not being discriminated against in employment, getting physically attacked, or being thrown out of the house, such a scary thing. I believe that you pointed out in some other post a while ago about how the population of natural born citizens is on the decline and we need more immigration to keep the population levels up. Do you honestly believe that constantly bombarding ppl with media encouraging non-traditional family (or non-family) SJW lifestyles has no effect on population or birth rates? Or are you like the guy in the vid and in total denial that any such agenda exists? Well the term "SJW agenda" is nebulous and can mean girls with green hair screaming at a political rally about god knows what or it can mean anything the person against "SJWs" wants it to mean, as said before I have seen Dragon Age defined as an "SJW game" and that persons biggest issue was the strong female characters so to them "women = SJW". You defined SJWs as LGBT people in this post and yes the media has been pushing to be more inclusive of LGBT people, I don't see how thats a bad thing. Also I never saw not having kids as an "SJW" thing but as I said that is a nebulous term so I can it can mean anything. I just watched the movie " 1984" for the first time. Interesting movie. Sure, it's fiction and things maybe aren't quite as bad as this movie yet. However, it's eerily prophetic with the rampant Socialism, compelled speech/controlled language laws, destruction of the traditional family (so that it doesn't get in the way of loyalty to the state/party), spying on citizens (which Ed Snowden proved some years back), and the state/party staging false national crisis (pick & choose your crisis, whether Republicans or Democrats are in power). lol Rampant socialism? Are you high? Last I checked unemployment doesn't even cover the bills and I have to pay to go to the doctor, not to mention the homelessness problem. Where is this socialism? 1984 was a hard left totalitarian government. The USA has very weak organized labor and worker rights, and has the biggest concentration of wealth at the top since the Gilded Age. There is no real "left wing" in this country and it really died in the Reagan 80s. We are far closer to being a Cyberpunk Libertarian Dystopia then anything resembling 1984. A right wing president just snapped his fingers and the "big bad government" ground to a halt and we had trashing piling up everywhere and tons of economic damage. America is far closer to fascism then anything else.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2019 20:39:41 GMT -5
He's says it's nebulous and suggests the left has no such agenda. If that's true, then why do we see SJW (gay, transgenders, and non-sex/non-binary gender) displayed in all sorts of media (news, tv, movies, etc.). imo, anyone who doesn't see this has been hiding in a cave for the last decade at least. lol I'm glad you have finally defined SJWs since from your posts on this forum you are very preoccupied with it. So you yourself just defined SJWs as LGBT. So I take it you oppose LGBT rights. So with all the problems in society and with concentration of wealth at the top your number one issue is "sticking it" to LGBT people. *yawn* As he said in this video being an "anti-SJW" is the core of your identity so you just oppose anything to do with SJWs and hence gays. In the 1990s is was "lol faggots", in the 2000s it was "I oppose the homosexual agenda" and now in the late 2010s its "I oppose the SJW agenda". Its the same old school thing dressed up in different language. That "agenda" is just not being discriminated against in employment, getting physically attacked, or being thrown out of the house, such a scary thing. I believe that you pointed out in some other post a while ago about how the population of natural born citizens is on the decline and we need more immigration to keep the population levels up. Do you honestly believe that constantly bombarding ppl with media encouraging non-traditional family (or non-family) SJW lifestyles has no effect on population or birth rates? Or are you like the guy in the vid and in total denial that any such agenda exists? Well the term "SJW agenda" is nebulous and can mean girls with green hair screaming at a political rally about god knows what or it can mean anything the person against "SJWs" wants it to mean, as said before I have seen Dragon Age defined as an "SJW game" and that persons biggest issue was the strong female characters so to them "women = SJW". You defined SJWs as LGBT people in this post and yes the media has been pushing to be more inclusive of LGBT people, I don't see how thats a bad thing. Also I never saw not having kids as an "SJW" thing but as I said that is a nebulous term so I can it can mean anything. I just watched the movie " 1984" for the first time. Interesting movie. Sure, it's fiction and things maybe aren't quite as bad as this movie yet. However, it's eerily prophetic with the rampant Socialism, compelled speech/controlled language laws, destruction of the traditional family (so that it doesn't get in the way of loyalty to the state/party), spying on citizens (which Ed Snowden proved some years back), and the state/party staging false national crisis (pick & choose your crisis, whether Republicans or Democrats are in power). lol Rampant socialism? Are you high? Last I checked unemployment doesn't even cover the bills and I have to pay to go to the doctor, not to mention the homelessness problem. Where is this socialism? 1984 was a hard left totalitarian government. The USA has very weak organized labor and worker rights, and has the biggest concentration of wealth at the top since the Gilded Age. There is no real "left wing" in this country and it really died in the Reagan 80s. We are far closer to being a Cyberpunk Libertarian Dystopia then anything resembling 1984. A right wing president just snapped his fingers and the "big bad government" ground to a halt and we had trashing piling up everywhere and tons of economic damage. America is far closer to fascism then anything else. Hey, I'm responding to the SJW videos I see posted here & there. If there's no willingness to debate, why post 'em? "That "agenda" is just not being discriminated against in employment, getting physically attacked, or being thrown out of the house, such a scary thing." Those rights are already there though. LGBT discrimination is against the law. Physically attack anybody (except in self-defense), that's a felony assault. Your ass lands in jail and gets the pants sued off of you. I don't think discrimination against LGBT is ok. But at the same time, the ppl who keep pushing the boundaries are annoying as fuck, because they say things like they're millions of genders, go apeshit on someone for accidentally "misgendering" a transgender person, want new laws that interfere with existing Constitutional law (such as compelled speech), and fire people for not using the exact PC language they approve of (even factual language, like simply stating observable differences between men and women). "Rampant socialism? Are you high? Last I checked unemployment doesn't even cover the bills and I have to pay to go to the doctor, not to mention the homelessness problem. Where is this socialism?" Then it seems you haven't looked into and/or don't know people who have or are on welfare. My youngest brother has been on welfare for years. He gets full medical (doctor, psychiatrist, medicine) all covered by govt welfare. He has an Obama (free) phone. He's a drug addict and can't get work because of it, so he lives with the parents. There are shelters and places he could stay for free, which we know because we've looked into it. Food stamps are indefinite also, though at some point they make you go to work for it (in a job that they find and place you in)... unless you're disabled of course, then working is not required. My sister has a stepdaughter, who's ex-boyfriend had a disability income that's greater than my salary. No joke (albeit, I believe he's in California, so go figure). "We are far closer to being a Cyberpunk Libertarian Dystopia then anything resembling 1984." If we're Libertarian, why do we always vote Republican or Democrat? I do believe there's a Libertarian party in this country, but they always lose. "America is far closer to fascism then anything else." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FascismFunny you believe that, considering that I've never been arrested for not singing the Star Spangled Banner at a sporting event, nor for being ultra-critical of my government in any way. And it's not because i'm on one side or the other, because you can be critical on the opposing side and not worry about this either. Edit: imo, you can't say we're both Libertarian and Fascist because those would be two opposing forces. I definitely believe the Libertarians are a minority group. Just look at election results and there's no arguing this point. On paper, we're a Constitutional Republic (representative Democracy). In practice, imo, we're a hybrid Socialist/Capitalist (since the powerful special interests, mostly Megacorps, hold sway over govt through Super-PACs/campaign contributions, as much if not more than voters). We're socialist because we're heavily taxed (in my Money & Banking class, the prof said about 50 cents of every dollar earned is taxed) and those tax $'s are redistributed. Our welfare monies are divided up between social welfare (like the welfare I mentioned earlier) and corporate welfare (defense industry, agriculture, big oil are massively subsidized by govt).
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 29, 2019 8:52:55 GMT -5
Honestly at this point I don't there is any point in replying. Its getting to be pretty long and I don't feel like breaking up quotes into sections.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 29, 2019 17:58:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 29, 2019 21:46:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 29, 2019 21:56:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Coolverine on Jan 30, 2019 6:34:09 GMT -5
I've noticed sometimes the guest eats the entire chicken wing, but sometimes they take only a small bite and throw the rest away (like Weird Al). I think in this one they actually say that it's allowed to not eat the entire chicken wing and just take a small bite instead, I think Ramsay showed a lot of courage by eating the entire things though.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 30, 2019 12:26:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Coolverine on Jan 30, 2019 21:41:38 GMT -5
Wow, I thought that show had ended.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 30, 2019 21:42:14 GMT -5
Wow, I thought that show had ended. First one in like 8 years
|
|
|
Post by Coolverine on Jan 30, 2019 22:29:06 GMT -5
Yeah they animation looks newer.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Jan 31, 2019 22:31:24 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2019 3:46:23 GMT -5
@4:32 - weak He's saying that past slavery and generations they've never met (due to being such a damn long time ago) is a reason for illiteracy. What? Obama, among many others, can read and graduate from the highest rated colleges. Albeit, the colleges scoring system for admissions gives them bonus points just for race and race-based full-ride scholarships. But worth mentioning, because it's not like the demands for special treatment and reparations haven't already been addressed. Next argument/excuse is generational poverty. Predictable, because it's brought up so often. My own mom came from a poor background. My parents didn't pay my way through college. I took out loans and paid it back. This guy might say I succeeded because I'm white and there's "white privilege" in this country. If that's true, then why do we see countless Asians with low income backgrounds immigrating from impoverished countries and excelling in college? My ex girlfriend and her brother (Asians) grew up poor, their dad past away decades ago and they were raised by their mom. Yet, they came to the states, excelled in college, found good jobs, and made comfortable lives for themselves. Lots of African Americans are doing the same these days, so that one dude is playing a weak hand if all he has is the race card.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Feb 2, 2019 17:21:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Cop on Feb 3, 2019 11:38:34 GMT -5
I have that movie on DVD. It's by Darren Lynn Bousman, who directed a couple of Saw movies. I really enjoyed listening to his commentaries.
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Feb 3, 2019 17:47:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Feb 4, 2019 10:29:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ForRealTho on Feb 6, 2019 17:54:59 GMT -5
|
|